Vorschau
What makes it trustworthy

Why you can trust what comes out

Anyone can ask an AI about the future. The difference is whether you can defend the answer. Vorschau is built so every claim traces back to a source, diversity is enforced rather than hoped for, and the system checks its own work, with you in the loop on the decisions that matter. What a run actually does lives on How it works.

The trust moat

Six commitments behind every run

These are what separate auditable AI foresight from a clever prompt and a confident answer. Each one is built into the system, not bolted on afterward.

Trace

Source tracking on every claim

Every output carries a traceable line back from strategy → scenario → trend → signal → source. No claim exists without that chain, and fabricated citations fail the check. You can click any conclusion and walk it back to where it came from.

Corroborate

Two sources before it counts

A weak signal isn't promoted until it shows up in at least two independent sources. Single-source claims stay flagged as hints. The two-source rule is cheap, and it keeps rumour-driven scenarios out of your brief.

Diversity

Diversity enforced, not hoped for

Scenario diversity is enforced by a quality gate, not left to chance. Breadth of signals, depth of interpretation and spread of scenario archetypes are all measured, and a run that comes up shallow is regenerated. AI tends to converge on the obvious. The system pushes it apart.

Challenge

Built-in challenge, not flattery

A devil's advocate critiques the work as it goes, and a separate red team applies sustained adversarial pressure with its own evidence. Dissent is surfaced and shown to you, not smoothed over into a single confident answer.

Human

You hold the high-leverage decisions

The system pauses at the calls that matter (your question, the scenario axes, the core assumptions, what to commit to) and waits for you. You approve the turning points; the AI handles the legwork in between.

Calibrate

Checked against reality

Every probabilistic statement is stored with the date it will be checked. As the early warning signs resolve, the system scores its own forecast accuracy and tells you which judgments to trust more, or less. Trust is earned against outcomes, not asserted up front.

Data & handling

Commitments, not aspirations

These hold for every session, not policies written after the fact. Every line below is either built into the platform or gates access to it.

  • Your data stays on EU-hosted endpoints. Both live providers run in Sweden Central.
  • No training on your data: the endpoints are configured for enterprise data handling, so your inputs are never used to train models.
  • You can export or delete any session at any time, and you hold every high-leverage decision.
  • When its confidence is low, the system says so, including which sources it had to skip, and why.

Keep reading

Where to go next

Two short detours that round out the picture.

Want to try it on a real decision?

Create an account, describe the decision you're facing, and run a foresight workshop end-to-end. No slide decks, no setup calls. A run starts in under a minute.